Simile or Not Simile? - Automatic Detection of Metonymic Relations in Japanese Literal Comparisons
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we propose a method of automatic distinction between two types of formally identical expressions in Japanese: similes and “metonymical comparisosn”, i.e. literal comparisons that include metonymic relations between elements. Expression like "kujira no you na chiisai me" can be translated into English as "eyes small as whale's", while in Japanese, due to the lack of possessive case, it can be misunderstood as "eyes small as a whale". The reason behind this is the presence of metonymic relation between components of such expressions. In the abovegiven example the word “whale” is a metonymy and represents “whale’s eye”. This is naturally understandable for humans, although formally difficult to detect by automatic algorithms, as both types of expressions (similes and metonymical comparisons) realize the same template. In this work we present a system able to distinguish between these two types of expressions. The system takes a Japanese expession as input and uses the Internet to check possessive relations between its elements. We propose a method of calculating a score based on co-occurrence of source and target pairs in Google (e.g. "whale's eye"). Evaluation experiment showed that the system distinguishes between similes and metonimical comparisons with the accuracy of 74%. We discuss the results and give some ideas for the future.
منابع مشابه
When Do Vehicles of Similes Become Figurative? Gaze Patterns Show that Similes and Metaphors are Initially Processed Differently
Recent emphases on differences between metaphors and similes pose a quandary. The two forms clearly differ in strength, but often seem to require similar interpretations. In Experiment 1 we show that ratings of comprehensibility are highly correlated across simile and metaphor sentences differing only in the presence or absence of “like”. In Experiment 2 we show that comprehensibility ratings f...
متن کاملNew Perspectives into Rhetorical Structure of Simile in the Poems of Bidel Dehlavi
Through a rhetorical system, poets’ and writers’ worldview is reflected in their literary works. One effective factor in forming or changing these viewpoints is the happenings and changes of the world poets dwell on different levels. Simile is an important structure in the rhetorical system. In this piece of research the writers have tried to show how structure of simile in Bidel reveals transf...
متن کاملAutomatic Detection of Metonymies using Associative Relations between Words
It is crucial for computers to detect metonymic expressions because sentences including them may have different meanings from literal ones. In previous studies, detecting metonymies has been done mainly by rule-based and statistical approaches. The problem of current metonymy detection is that using syntactic and semantic information may be not enough to detect metonymic expressions. In this st...
متن کاملERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors.
Cognitive linguists suggest that understanding metaphors requires activation of conceptual mappings between the involved concepts. We tested whether mappings are indeed in use during metaphor comprehension, and what mapping means as a cognitive process with Event-Related Potentials. Participants read literal, conventional metaphorical, novel metaphorical, and anomalous target sentences preceded...
متن کاملThe intellectual Simile in Tarikh-e-Vassaf
Simile, which appears in different modes, is one of the major subjects of a branch of rhetoric called Bayan. Some of these modes, such as intellectual-intellectual and sensible-intellectual are not in harmony with the illuminating role of simile; therefor, the books on Bayanhardlyhave positive attitudes towards these modes of simile, but contrary to this attitude, such similes appea...
متن کامل